Marketing

How to stay out of social media Bizarro World

First, take a hit off this (start at 1:50):

Then – quickly – absorb about thirty seconds of this:

Now imagine that it is Andy Williams and Steve Austin that are fighting, on a pastel-hued sound stage, with Sasquatch prancing about in a skirt.

That, my friends, is the sort of bizarro world you must conjure to effectively register the real estate social media universe these days.

A bad trip

Social media hit real estate about four years ago, at roughly the same time the market began its slide. The attention and energy of a restless industry flowed into blogs, online real estate communities, and mainstream social networks.

It all made sense. Real estate is a social business. It’s based on service – on people – not product or even, really, on brands. Real estate brokers and agents had been masters of social media for generations, blogging, in a sense, whenever someone at the grocery store asked “How’s the market?” and networking on platforms like Rotary or the PTA.

This social media thing was made for real estate.

But does it feel to you like real estate has really nailed it? It doesn’t to me. In fact, cases of social media success in our industry are few and far between.

There are lots of reasons why. The details are less important than some of the faulty assumptions driving them:

  • That hundreds of thousands of under-experienced practitioners could play effectively on a platform that rewards substance
  • That the social media opportunity would get bigger the easier it got to participate
  • That social media marketing could be sensibly peddled to agents by many of the same folks who convinced them that haranguing their friends and neighbors with scripts was a good idea

Welcome to Bizzaro world. Meet Andy, Steve and Sasquatch.

But you said this was good shit

Right. It is. All this social media stuff can be really valuable.

But there are caveats – big ones – we put to clients when assessing the viability of social media as a marketing strategy. Sometimes we go for it, sometimes we don’t. And that’s OK. There are other ways to approach the marketplace.

We have not become cynical, just more careful.

Here are a few of those caveats:

  • Writing is a skill you must possess, or hire, to be successful. Writing is hard for most people. It’s hard for me right now as I sit in seat 12C, my mind wandering across the isle, out the window – anywhere but this screen. But good writing is absolutely essential to most social media strategies. If you’re not strong in this area – and plenty of smart people aren’t – don’t shine a spotlight on it.
  • Social media marketing costs just as much or more than “traditional” marketing. You’re going to need to spend a lot more in time and spend your money in different places. On a marketing director with great writing skills, for example. Or a video producer who can do right by you. Social media needs to be treated with the same care that big newspaper ad contract received back in the day if you want results.

  • Don’t believe anyone who says blogs are passĂ©. Just because 95% of agents and an only slightly smaller percentage of brokerage companies lack the skills needed to publish a great blog does not mean they are not still the best way to engage. Can you exposit a complex thought in a Tweet? Can you build trust with a status update? It’s important to understand that there are no shortcuts.
  • It’s from you but not about you. Reality TV may be popular, but no one wants to tune into the show called You. It’s your blog, your Twitter account, your YouTube channel. But just because you own it does not mean it’s a good idea to broadcast the quotidian pitter-patter of your life. No one cares. I’ve felt the temptation to write about something off-topic here from time to time, just because I can. But I always think better of it. No one wants to hear about how I spend my weekends, my workout regimen, or my thinking about how John Gosselin should be getting his shit together. Writing for a reader is harder than writing about yourself. But remember, this isn’t supposed to be easy.
  • You must be willing to make yourself uncomfortable. Who am I going to piss off? Is that reference too weird? I have a twinge of fear every time I hit “publish.” But I do it anyway. If you don’t push yourself to share things others can’t or won’t, or say what they will say in a distinctive way, you’re probably wasting your time. Explore the taboo. Embrace controversy. Open yourself to criticism. Safe loses every time.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to put on my favorite Andy Williams sweater and go unleash some whoop-ass on Steve Austin.


Measuring influence on Twitter: Who “cares?”

Recently, I found myself backstage at a Black Eyed Peas concert courtesy of my best bud, who handles the band. A chair on the side of the stage was offered to me, a few feet away from the action. Below, a tent filled with food was at my disposal.

My friend is very influential in the music business. As a result, I got hooked up. But at no point did his influence really rub off on me.

Influence matters

Last Sunday, my inbox was deluged with new Twitter followers. It continued all weekend. In torrents.

I could have shut the emails off but between spam flotsam and porn jetsam I like keeping track of my account as I regularly remove or block the unsavory.

On Tuesday, I learned Stefan Swanepoel released a list of the “most influential real estate people on Twitter.” I was on that list.

Obviously, Stefan has some influence. He persuaded hundreds of people to take action and follow me. But is that as influential as it gets? Can he influence them to read our blog? Hire us?

I also wondered why, exactly, these agents chose to follow us. Stefan claimed we’re influential. In what way? Under what context or circumstance?

This got me thinking about the various Twitter strategies offered to agents and the crowds of people they’re coached to follow, tweet to and ultimately try to exert their own influence upon.

Finally, I wondered what if any effects there are when 400+ seemingly un-influential people follow me for no reason but never engage me.

I decided to find out. I made two phone calls as soon as I was able to locate an AT&T signal.

Call #1

I spoke to Stefan regarding his list. It was put together as a takeaway during a live presentation for agents and brokers who don’t know where or how to get started. His list offered attendees a starting point. 100 people to follow.

There was no strategy behind it. No guidelines. No advice on what to do once they hit the follow button in order to get these influential individuals to follow them back. Or how become an influencer themselves.

I asked Stefan what makes the folks on the list influential. He offered me his criteria:

  1. Quality of posts
  2. Quantity of posts
  3. Number of influential people they follow
  4. Number of influential people who follow them

Nothing scientific. These are things he values. I don’t disagree.

A few days later Dustin published his own list of influential people. This list was half the size and ranked by influence based on an API he wrote.

Call #2

Joe Fernandez is a friend of mine. He is also the founder of Klout, a service that measures influence across the social web. We talked about influence, Twitter strategy, popularity and what it means in the grand scheme. I sent him Stefan’s list and asked if he could run all the names through Klout.

I found the results incredibly confusing. At first glance you notice that the number of followers a person has does not directly correlate to how influential they are within the greater context of Twitter. Nor does their volume of Tweets. In fact, some on the list with many followers and many posts ranked much lower than others with less of each.

So I asked Joe to explain his assessment of influence. Here’s what he had to say:

MD: Joe, give me the elevator pitch on Klout to lay groundwork for this discussion.

JF:  Sure. There are people who possess great influence. They can use it wisely and can make things happen. The same holds true in social media. Klout measures that influence for each person across multiple topics.

MD: How do you do that?

JF:  We use a metric we call “True Reach” which represents the number of followers that care about your tweets. We look at how influential those people who care about you are and then we normalize that data across all of the people on Twitter to come up with a 1-100 “Klout Score” representing overall influence.

MD: What do you mean by “care?”

JF: “Care” is defined by actions followers take, such as retweeting or engaging you in conversation on your post. We’re tracking over 3 million people now across Twitter and measuring “care” across 25 different variables.

MD: In other words, Oprah, Obama and Bono follow me but never react to my posts. That’s an example of not caring.

JF: Right. But if they take action on your post, and their followers take action on their action of your post thus creates a domino effect, Klout translates that as influence.

MD: This explains why some with high follower counts have low scores?

JF: Yes. A large number of followers that are not engaged does not make one influential. Influence is the ability to drive action. People with huge follower numbers but have a low Klout Score aren’t driving actions.

MD: What is the value in amassing social influence?

JF:  We’re talking about social capital. Your ability to influence others has currency. Companies are no longer looking at customers and determining their lifetime value based on the volume of stuff they’re going to buy.  Companies now think about the “network value” of each customer – their connections, followers, friends and the influence and ability they have to drive others either towards or away from their brand.

MD: Can influence be created?

JF: Sure. In the past it was always about the high school quarterback being cooler than the chemistry class whiz kid or the rich guy being treated better than regular folks and that’s the way it is. Through social media anyone can effectively build and engage an audience.

MD: Why is measuring and amassing influence important for real estate people?

JF: 96% of Gen-Y uses social media. They’re real estate’s next customer. What they value, how they search and how they decide will be guided on their platforms of choice and through the counsel of others across social media. Influence matters. An agent will one day matter to those consumers who themselves have built up social influence.

MD: What’s an average Klout Score?

JF:  15.

MD: Really? That seems awfully low.

JF: We’ve seen people with 2,000 followers who Tweet all the time but have a Klout Score of 3. Some of the people on both lists you referenced have scores that rank low. Some don’t even rank yet.

MD: But yet they’re considered influential.

JF: Well here’s the thing – all told, influence is still relative and personal. A person with a score of 3 could be considered very influential to one person – Stefan or Dustin in this situation. In that context, that’s all that matters. Klout does not attempt to detract from that reality at all. We measure some things, but not everything.   

MD: What would be an unnaturally high score?

JF: 60 and above is bordering on influential royalty. One person on Stefan’s list scored an 80. That is unusually high.

MD: Any advice for real estate Twitter users?

JF:  Don’t waste money buying followers (which I can prove a few people on that list did). Don’t waste time following people just so they will follow you back. Don’t be noisy with your tweets. Create saved searches (on Tweetdeck) for your market area so that when other people talk about it you can jump in the conversation and provide useful answers to their questions. Tweet like you’re an expert on your community and other people searching will inevitably find you. Engage in real discussion, not just @ message your followers one by one to tell them “good morning.” Also, consider who you follow. We notice that many real estate agents are following other real estate agents and that’s their entire strategy. They need to reach outside their category and create reactions across a wide band of topics. Become the person people turn to when they have a question and you will be truly influential.

MD: Last question: The 400+ people that followed me in two days. Did that decrease my Klout Score or diminish my influence?

JF:  No. But they did little to increase your influence. Here’s your challenge: Research who these people are and adjust your Twitter strategy to engage a portion of them. This will increase your score.

MD: Great. Just what I need – homework.

JF: You asked.

Theory of influential relativity

While Klout measures social influence across 25 different variables, it missed at least two: Stefan and Dustin’s variables. And they matter too.

While there is no perfectly constructed instrument to measure influence, it is clear that attending to a sound methodology and strategy regarding who you follow, what you say, how often you say it, and how much value to bring to multiple communities is the clearest path toward building influence.

And however you measure influence, that just makes sense.

Here are the Klout Scores for everyone on Stefan’s list:

- Davison
Twitter: 1000wattmarc


Social distortion

media Center | Rubbermaid

What’s wrong with this picture?

Nothing too terrible, really. Just a callout on the “About Us” page of a major consumer products Website. Pretty standard stuff.

But you will notice the “ShareThis” widget. Which is not itself too offensive but is emblematic of something that’s been bugging me a lot lately.

Laziness, namely.

As it has become easier to widget-ize, chiclet-ize, communit-ize or otherwise adorn a website with social media bling, I see an increasing number of companies – many in real estate – darting toward each shiny object on the social web, while forgetting that what matters, ultimately, is quality content. Smarts. Cred. Candor.

So I don’t think I’ll be ”sharing” the Rubbermaid press page on Facebook. And who will? The QA team? A plastics fetishist?

Maybe I’m overreacting. But my point, anyway, having been in the trenches with lots of companies trying to play in social media, is this: Doing one thing well is better than being everywhere half-way, being gratuitous, or asking those whom your brand touches to do silly stuff.


Get a jolt of 1000Watt

Receive new blog posts the instant we hit publish.

No spam

Like a Man-Lamb tethered to the Space Shuttle floating miles above the competition

[Note: I offer the following as a playful prayer for an end to "personal" branding in real estate]

***

I want to do my part to help you. If you want to nail a great brand identity, do this:

Start with Photoshop. Don’t bother reading the manual. The truth is, the more you know, the less apt you are to break rules. And breaking conventional rules is what the real estate branding game is all about.

So download the program and then …

Photoshop an image of your face on things. Fruit. Street signs. Weaponry. Heavy machinery. Farm animals rock too. If by some chance your last name is a noun … home run, man. You can kill two branding birds with one boulder.

Now if by some miracle your name contains both a noun and an adjective – like, say, Matt Mirthful - we’re talking about dominant market share days after you launch your campaign.

As for a slogan, think of it this way: just write the first thing that comes to mind. Forget that stuff about writing, knowing your audience or hiring those Madison Ave.-style admen. It’s not like they can do any better.

Instead, follow your stream of consciousness. Go with things things like:

I will make all your dreams come true. Wake up, text me, consider it done.

Not only am I an amazing agent, I can rock your world all week and twice on Sunday.

I go the extra mile. But that’s it. That’s as far as I take it. JK. I’m so funny.

I possess every righteous trait imaginable. Honest. Sophisticated. I have integrity. I never lie. I speak all languages. I’ve held every job there is so, really, I can do everything you need and I can do it better than anyone who has ever lived. Come to think of it, I am probably the almighty.

There isn’t a deal I can’t close, an offer I can’t negotiate, a price I can’t get, a car I can’t outrun, a mathematical equation I can’t calculate in my head, a family dispute that I can’t resolve. In fact, tomorrow I plan on ending world hunger.

See what I mean? The more out there you get the better. Really. People respond positively to these things.

Think about how much Brylcreem must have spent for their slogan “A little dab’ll do ya.” Give me a break.

Trust me on this people. I’ve seen the future. In it was a Man-Lamb tethered to the Space Shuttle, floating in zero gravity miles above the competition.

Realtor_Dog

Okay, maybe the slogan should have read Light years ahead of the competition. Or maybe just a simple, “Baaaaaaa.”

But still.

So go for it.
I think everyone who wants to make millions in real estate should do this.
Man, I can’t wait for tomorrow.

- Davison
Twitter - @1000wattmarc


Real estate brand advertising and the Burger King Problem

[Beware: This post is a bit of a rambler – I’m thinking about several issues here that I will flesh out later.]

Does consumer-facing brand advertising – print or online – work in real estate?

Rarely, I think.

But I don’t put the blame on the medium; I put it on the messengers.  Think about it: How many truly great real estate brand ads have you seen? Ads that provoke, inspire, connect with you in a way that matters?

Corcoran did it. Better Homes and Gardens does it. In my market, Alan Pinel has come close.

But these are exceptions.

So when I hear people in real estate dismiss brand advertising out of hand I suggest they stop and explore the matter. Because drawing this conclusion is a bit like saying hamburgers aren’t any good when all you’ve ever eaten is Burger King.

This is not to say that things could not be helped from the publisher side of the equation, particularly online. While most real estate brand ads on sites like Realtor.com, Zillow and others are pretty poor, it is also true that the formats are tired.

Leaderboard, skyscraper, banner … boring. Can’t we do better?

John Battelle, CEO of Federated Media, an ad network that connects advertisers with high-quality “conversational” publishers, offered one possibility earlier this week.

Federated Media introduced something it’s calling the “Ad Stamp,” (see a screencast and examples here) a coordinated brand display from one advertiser. The problem the Ad Stamp tries to solve is explained by Battelle thusly:

“…the relegation of marketing impressions to increasingly competing “third rails” on the sides and tops of sites has created a “Nascar effect” where more than five – if not 15 – messages blink numbly and disparately at their subjects. This is not a quality environment for readers or brand marketers, and it’s a premium publisher’s job to create a quality environment for both.”

The advertiser’s burden here is to deliver creative that makes something like this sing, to connect – or, better here online, engage — the viewer in a conversation. And what category is more conversational than real estate?

I guess what I’m getting to here is a challenge to some of the talk about real estate advertising that is beginning to congeal into conventional wisdom.  Print is not pointless – if you do it well. Online display advertising is not just gravy thrown on top of an enhanced listings buy – if publishers and advertisers get creative.

What do you think? Have you seen any good real estate brand ads lately? If so, link to them in the comments.

[Disclosure: Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate is a 1000watt Consulting client.]


The end of real estate websites, agent journalism and more food for thought from last week

Posting has been light here. Work is intense and my daughter started Kindergarten last week. A double whammy.

Here are a few notable things that blinked across my screen amidst the chaos…

Flickr releases an iPhone app

Read »


The intersection of anyone and anywhere

Brokers, as you read this, if you’re thinking “he’s not talking about me,” think again.

Your websites need work.
Some require a lot of work.
Some should be detonated.

Kaboom.

Read »


Sacrificing the few for the good of the many

I have no doubt this video will stir your emotions.

You will be shocked by the possible and blatant transgression of copyright violation displayed by the makers of this video who may not have obtained permission to create derivative work or the license required to synchronize their composition to video.

Read »


Breaking away from the “Undifferentiated Realty Mass”

Across the landscape it spreads, sticky and slow, a human jelly. Few escape its warm embrace. Once covered in its unguent, few escape.

A million cells floating together. Suspended in an ectoplasm of perverse incentives and low expectations.

I speak of the Undifferentiated Realty Mass.

Read »


Great marketing versus stupendously bad marketing

Good marketing

A good marketing campaign begins by understanding what you’re trying to achieve. It helps define who you are, what you stand for and how your brand should be perceived.

Marketing helps you shape your image; or that of your product or service.

Read »