<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here lies Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html</link>
	<description>Turn On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:35:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave deBruyn</title>
		<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-6831</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave deBruyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html#comment-6831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I liked the article &amp; Chris&#039; post re: ROI. If you recall the growth of online dating, the free services were all the rage, they came &amp; went. In the early stages people continually jumped ship &amp; followed, but eventually the paid model began to gain a foothold. My sense of why the paid model worked in online dating is that it served to establish a level of &quot;seriousness&quot; among the participants - quickly skiming off the scammers/spammers. A &quot;paid Twitter&quot; could become a more &quot;credible Twitter&quot;, and I for one would be glad to pay for the service.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the article &amp; Chris&#39; post re: ROI. If you recall the growth of online dating, the free services were all the rage, they came &amp; went. In the early stages people continually jumped ship &amp; followed, but eventually the paid model began to gain a foothold. My sense of why the paid model worked in online dating is that it served to establish a level of &quot;seriousness&quot; among the participants &#8211; quickly skiming off the scammers/spammers. A &quot;paid Twitter&quot; could become a more &quot;credible Twitter&quot;, and I for one would be glad to pay for the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Actually ActiveRain &#38; Trulia both REALLY suck... — Web Real Estate Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-4853</link>
		<dc:creator>Actually ActiveRain &#38; Trulia both REALLY suck... — Web Real Estate Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html#comment-4853</guid>
		<description>[...] guys have to say:Realestatewebtrainer, Greg at Bloodhound and Realestateindustrywatch. Marc at 1000Watt has a slightly different [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guys have to say:Realestatewebtrainer, Greg at Bloodhound and Realestateindustrywatch. Marc at 1000Watt has a slightly different [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfsellsius</title>
		<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-3183</link>
		<dc:creator>jfsellsius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html#comment-3183</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting question.  The same was asked about Google-- would you pay $5 per month?  The answers are interesting.  It was at the end of 2005 but still.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/y76b4r&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/y76b4r&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally,I would (probably) not pay for Twitter. IMO, you&#039;d see more blatant business marketing done on it. Corporate twitters would abound and all the interesting folks would likely leave to a easily copied version. Heck, if a few of the influencers left, many more would follow.  But hey, what do I know, I&#039;m still in the stock market. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question.  The same was asked about Google&#8211; would you pay $5 per month?  The answers are interesting.  It was at the end of 2005 but still.<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/y76b4r" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y76b4r</a></p>
<p>Personally,I would (probably) not pay for Twitter. IMO, you&#39;d see more blatant business marketing done on it. Corporate twitters would abound and all the interesting folks would likely leave to a easily copied version. Heck, if a few of the influencers left, many more would follow.  But hey, what do I know, I&#39;m still in the stock market. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Cammarosano</title>
		<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-3182</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Cammarosano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html#comment-3182</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Marc&lt;br /&gt;
Here is The Failed Promise of Real Estate 2.0- on year later &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.homegain.com/blogging-and-social-networking/the-failed-promise-of-real-estate-20/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.homegain.com/blogging-and-social-networking/the-failed-promise-of-real-estate-20/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marc<br />
Here is The Failed Promise of Real Estate 2.0- on year later <a href="http://blog.homegain.com/blogging-and-social-networking/the-failed-promise-of-real-estate-20/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.homegain.com/blogging-and-social-networking/the-failed-promise-of-real-estate-20/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Silver &#124; Toronto Real Estate Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-3181</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Silver &#124; Toronto Real Estate Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html#comment-3181</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There are great benefits to these sites and if the option is print, I will still consider it good value in comparison, even when there is a charge. Sign me up!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are great benefits to these sites and if the option is print, I will still consider it good value in comparison, even when there is a charge. Sign me up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Sena</title>
		<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-3180</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Sena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html#comment-3180</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am sure many eyes will be on AR to see how this decision to charge will affect it&#039;s future growth.  If AR is successful, I anticipate many of these sites like Twitter will enact a paid membership.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure many eyes will be on AR to see how this decision to charge will affect it&#39;s future growth.  If AR is successful, I anticipate many of these sites like Twitter will enact a paid membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave deBruyn</title>
		<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-3179</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave deBruyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html#comment-3179</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I liked the article &amp; Chris&#039; post re: ROI. If you recall the growth of online dating, the free services were all the rage, they came &amp; went. In the early stages people continually jumped ship &amp; followed, but eventually the paid model began to gain a foothold. My sense of why the paid model worked in online dating is that it served to establish a level of &quot;seriousness&quot; among the participants - quickly skiming off the scammers/spammers. A &quot;paid Twitter&quot; could become a more &quot;credible Twitter&quot;, and I for one would be glad to pay for the service.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the article &amp; Chris&#39; post re: ROI. If you recall the growth of online dating, the free services were all the rage, they came &amp; went. In the early stages people continually jumped ship &amp; followed, but eventually the paid model began to gain a foothold. My sense of why the paid model worked in online dating is that it served to establish a level of &quot;seriousness&quot; among the participants &#8211; quickly skiming off the scammers/spammers. A &quot;paid Twitter&quot; could become a more &quot;credible Twitter&quot;, and I for one would be glad to pay for the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Sandquist</title>
		<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-3178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Sandquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html#comment-3178</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter would be one worth paying for &quot;IF&quot; enough people paid for it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is meant at everybody &quot;Twitter owes you nothing&quot;. There is no easier way to drive traffic to a website/blog and meet/network with locals, for FREE!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter would be one worth paying for &quot;IF&quot; enough people paid for it. </p>
<p>This is meant at everybody &quot;Twitter owes you nothing&quot;. There is no easier way to drive traffic to a website/blog and meet/network with locals, for FREE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Dowell</title>
		<link>http://www.1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-3177</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Dowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2009/02/here-lies-web-20.html#comment-3177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My guess is that when a social networking site starts charging, members will drop and find another free service. Eventually, 1 or 2 sites will really dominate and start charging fees to its members. By this time they will have established a ROI.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that when a social networking site starts charging, members will drop and find another free service. Eventually, 1 or 2 sites will really dominate and start charging fees to its members. By this time they will have established a ROI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
