Cut your commission, offer buyer rebates, rock the website, get that
consumer religion … and, after a few hard-bitten years, fade away.
Such has been the trajectory of nearly all discount or "alternative" brokerage shops for the past decade.
Today, however, I spoke with Guy Wolcott, Co-founder of Sawbuck Realty, a new brokerage company in the DC market unveiling an "alternative" alternative model.
Without getting into the captious snarl of the "discounter" debate,
I’ll offer a few quick observations gleaned from my conversation with
Guy and a test drive of the site:
- They have turned the conventional wisdom on the alternative
brokerage model on its head — shunning buyer rebates. Instead, they
buy down the mortgage rate from their banking partner and negotiate
rock bottom settlement pricing from a national provider. This, it’s
worth noting, also goes against the recent trend among traditional
companies who often look at the brokerage deal as a loss leader for the
higher margins an in-house mortgage or settlement operation can offer. - From a consumer standpoint, the immediate settlement savings
coupled with the long-term savings associated with a below market
mortgage rate seems more appealing than a rebate check. - The company makes money by handing off buyers to hand picked agents
(mostly teams) who the company claims are top performing experts in the
buyer’s target neighborhood. - They have really nailed the home search. It’s as if they took all the great user experience queues from Estately
and then stripped out all the noise. As someone in the "less is more"
design camp, I think this offers a fine model for any brokerage company
looking to retool its search. - They claim that the business model pencils, of course. Though I
remain skeptical, I give them points for trying a different angle. They
still have to pay programmers and phone "agents", but the amount they
are paying to buy down the mortgage rate is likely less than a lump sum
rebate, while offering more value to the consumer long term.
It’s going to be interesting to see how this one plays out.
– Brian Boero
Sign up for the 1000watt Spotlight e-newsletter
and keep up with the ideas, apps and people that are changing real estate.
15 Ways to Make Your Marketing Mobile
A mist of difference
10 Tools for MLS Awesomeness
I can see where it could pencil as they are profiting from the ancillary services, which makes up for the "rebate".
I have considered modeling similar to this, however the concern to me is not the profit, but the liability and risk associated with now not only representing the buyer in the real estate transaction, but also the borrower in the mortgage transaction.
It's just one more channel where a conflict of interest could arise (Google "Real Estate Agent Sued California" to see a potential problem).
I'm not saying that it can't be done, and how nice would it be for a consumer who could go to one place to get a "team" of professionals together.
I applaud their effort and will keep my eye on them.
VERY nice website.
John
We considered ourselves flattered.
What's up with all of the pop ups?
Thanks for alerting me to the new company Sawbuck which opened up in our D.C. area. This is the first that I've heard of them. I'm going to take some time to browse through their website and learn a bit more about their business model. By the way, loved your presentation at Inman NYC.
So, this company is referring all of their buyers to other real estate companies? It would take a large (and steady) volume of buyers working with them to make that business model feasible.
I give the consumer a choice; a rebate after closing or use the rebate funds to lower their interest rate or closing costs.
we can fix things
Thanks for alerting me to the new company Sawbuck which opened up in our D.C. area. This is the first that I've heard of them. I'm going to take some time to browse through their website and learn a bit more about their business model. By the way, loved your presentation at Inman NYC.